Several speakers at the conference on climate change whose theme was "Global warming is not a crisis," took pot-shots at the ex-vice president and his film, "An Inconvenient Truth," which won last year's Academy Award for best documentary.
"Whether we like it or not, it was extremely effective propaganda," said Timothy Ball, an environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg.
"It was appropriate that he got an Oscar from the land of make-believe," he joked.
I'm concerned about the environment as much as anyone, but I don't trust any politician with any hidden agenda. What have companies done since his documentary? I mean who can even listen to this slow speaking f*ck for more than ten minutes? ;p
Watch the Great Global Warming Swindle (offline from video google now I see, great, check these youtube links instead)
In this documentary they show you that co² is an effect, and not a cause of global warming... Because it seems the 'Inconvenient Truth' only shows you a portion of the data.
What if their terrorism agenda backfires? and they pull the global warming card. And anybody who threatens Gaia will be labeled an enemy of peace and freedom, subhuman and anything else they use to label terrorists.
It's funny, terrorism is something the 'elite' cause using false flag "operations".
Global Warming, if true is something they caused with their "corporations". (not to mention pollution).
This link was found on Posthuman Blues
From the blogpost:
Attendees watched a movie, "A Climate of Fear," by conservative TV commentator Glenn Beck, who charged that anyone who opposes the view that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are causing the earth to warm up, are branded "heretics or Nazis."
"Nazis," huh? Geez. That's a little harsh. Border-line crackpot, in fact. But I shouldn't be saying that because that would imply that I was a Nazi. (This Glenn Beck character plays a mean game.)"
So you watch a lecture by a slow talking politician and everybody who doesn't agree with the evidence (not proof) for the theory is a border-line crackpot... (well not really!)
I will always research those that are labeled crackpot by the Consensus Reality pushers in the media and authorities. You know why? Because to any reasonable human being they are the freaking crackpots ;)
This is why I put so much emphasis on BS, belief systems:
no facts or logic - just emotions in defending a belief based on shady evidence. Circuit 2: the Divide & Conquer circuit.
And all of this doesn't mean I think corporations should hurry up and stop polluting our wonderful planet. Like it'll happen though.